Those accountable for a system of care have an interest in managing services to maximize the potential for wellness in community settings. Promoting care in the least-restrictive environment possible is more recovery oriented than providing avoidable inpatient care, and it has been enshrined into law by the U.S. Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision. Community-based care is also less costly than higher levels of care. Thus payers and clinicians have aligned incentives for reducing possible excessive use of acute care services, such as emergency and inpatient care.
Payers have developed many sophisticated data-driven methods for monitoring network performance; however, these analyses are often based on financial claims data, which may lag behind the services provided by as much as 90 days. This delay makes it difficult to address problems early. Furthermore, such efforts may not fully realize the potential for providers at ground level to contribute additional context and ideas...
To continue reading, download the full article below:
Using Lean to Rapidly and Sustainably Transform a Behavioral Health Crisis Program: Impact on Throughput and Safety
Background: Lean has been increasingly applied in health careView
The Tucson Mental Health Support Team (MHST) Model: A prevention focused approach to crisis and public safety
ABSTRACT While Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) programs provideView
The Banner Psychiatric Center: A Model for Providing Psychiatric Crisis Care to the Community while Easing Behavioral Health Holds in Emergency Departments
Abstract Banner Health in the Phoenix, AZ, metropolitan areaView
Alternatives to the Emergency Department
TO THE EDITOR: The November Taking Issue column by Marvin S.View
A Preventive Approach to Crisis and Public Safety
Effective collaboration between law enforcement and crisisView
CRISES: A Framework for Developing Performance Measures for Behavioral Health Crisis and Psychiatric Emergency Programs.
Abstract Crisis and emergency psychiatric services are an integralView